Butt AE, Cabrera S, Chavez C, Corley S, Cortez A, Figueroa J, Kitto M, Torner E (2005) Basal forebrain cholinergic lesions produce a dissociation of impairment in delay and trace conditioning in rats. Neuroscience 2005 Abstracts 644.2. Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DC.
Summary: Recent research suggests that Pavlovian trace conditioning, but not delay conditioning, requires awareness or attention, where these processes appear to depend on specific brain systems. For example, Clark, Manns, and Squire (2002) have shown that although amnesiac humans with damage to the hippocampus (HPC) acquire a normal conditioned response (CR) in delay conditioning paradigms where the conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US) partly overlap, they fail to acquire the CR in trace conditioning paradigms where the CS and US are separated in time. Han and colleagues (2003) have shown that the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is similarly necessary for trace but not delay conditioning in rats. The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) is also involved in trace but not delay conditioning (Kronforst-Collins & Disterhoft, 1998). The basal forebrain cholinergic system (BFCS) has projections to mPFC, ACC, and HPC. Given that each of these regions is critical for trace but not delay conditioning, we hypothesized that lesions of the BFCS using 192 IgG-saporin (SAP) would selectively impair trace but not delay appetitive conditioning in rats. Rats received bilateral injections of SAP or saline only (control group) into BFCS prior to conditioning with a tone CS and sucrose pellet US in either a delay or 10 s trace conditioning paradigm. Preliminary results support this hypothesis. Compared to controls, rats in the BFCS lesion group showed moderate impairment in delay conditioning but more severe impairment in the trace conditioning paradigm. Rats in both groups showed an increase in differential responding to the CS in the delay paradigm, although the BFCS lesion group showed less conditioned responding than controls. In contrast, only the controls showed progressive differential responding to the CS in the trace conditioning paradigm. These data suggest that the BFCS contribute critically to the maintenance of attention in Pavlovian trace conditioning.
Related Products: 192-IgG-SAP (Cat. #IT-01)