Torner EK, Flesher MM, Chavez CM, Linton KD, Herbert MS, Butt AE (2006) 192 IgG-saporin lesions of the cholinergic basal forebrain disrupt attention and awareness in Pavlovian trace but not delay conditioning in rats. Neuroscience 2006 Abstracts 667.19. Society for Neuroscience, Atlanta, GA.
Summary: Recent research suggests that Pavlovian trace conditioning, but not delay conditioning, requires awareness or attention, where these processes appear to depend on specific brain systems. For example, past research has shown that although amnesiac humans with damage to the hippocampus (HPC) acquire a normal conditioned response (CR) in delay conditioning paradigms where the conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (US) partly overlap, they fail to acquire the CR in trace conditioning paradigms where the CS and US are separated in time. Others have shown that the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) is similarly necessary for trace but not delay conditioning in rats. Another study in rabbits also suggests medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) involvement in trace but not delay conditioning. The basal forebrain cholinergic system (BFCS) has projections to mPFC, ACC, and HPC. Given that each of these regions is critical for trace but not delay conditioning, we hypothesized that lesions of the BFCS using 192 IgG-saporin (SAP) would selectively impair trace but not delay appetitive conditioning in rats. Rats received bilateral injections of SAP or saline only (sham lesion control group) into BFCS prior to conditioning with a white noise CS and sucrose pellet US in either a delay or 10 s trace conditioning paradigm. Results supported our hypotheses, with the BFCS lesion group showing normal delay conditioning but impaired trace conditioning. In order to assess the potential for distraction to exacerbate the observed BFCS lesion-induced impairments in trace conditioning, a visual distracter (continuously flashing light) was added to the trace conditioning paradigm in a second experiment. Given evidence suggesting BFCS involvement in attention, it was hypothesized that the addition of a visual distracter to the trace conditioning task would cause a greater degree of impairment in the BFCS lesion group than in the control group tested in that task. Preliminary data support this hypothesis. Together, these experiments suggest that the BFCS is necessary for normal trace conditioning, which is argued to require both awareness and working memory. The additional impairment in trace conditioning caused by the visual distracter further suggests a role for the BFCS in mediating attention.
Related Products: 192-IgG-SAP (Cat. #IT-01)